Christopher Kaczor, The Ethics of Abortion: Women’s Rights, Human Life, and the Question of Justice. Author(s): David DeGrazia. Source: Ethics, Vol. , No. Buy The Ethics of Abortion: Women’s Rights, Human Life, and the Question of Justice (Routledge Annals of Bioethics) 1 by Christopher Kaczor (ISBN. The Ethics of Abortion: Women’s Rights, Human. Life, and the Question of Justice . Christopher Kaczor. Loyola Marymount University. Follow this and additional.
|Published (Last):||4 March 2010|
|PDF File Size:||17.24 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||3.63 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Follow the Author
I highly recommend it. The book serves both as a comprehensive overview of the debate regarding abortion over the past forty years and as an accessible yet philosophically serious contribution to that debate. Although some of these analyses can be found elsewhere in the extensive literature on the abortion issue, Kaczor’s book contains the most complete, the most penetrating and the most up-to-date set of critiques of the arguments for abortion choice presently available.
Kaczor’s weak arguments are not a sufficient basis for overriding the important cchristopher of reproductive choice. Amazon Drive Cloud storage from Amazon. Alexa Actionable Analytics for the Web.
A final chapter is concerned with artificial wombs. Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University’s proxy server Configure custom proxy use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy.
A Critique of Alison M. Kaczor tries to deal with them. Is Sthics a Question of Personal Morality?
Set up a giveaway. Mathew Lu – – Human Life Review 39 1: The other problem is that much of this book is concerned with critical analyses of the views of others, and the views of others often don’t fit well into the categories outlined by Kaczor’s chapters. It will certainly not persuade anyone who is convinced as I am by the arguments of Alan Shewmon that the death of the brain is not sufficient for the death of a human being. Some, such as the case of twinning, can be dealt with in many other works.
It brings together under one cover a thoughtful and readily accessible account of the positions and arguments of the major disputants, and it argues for its position in philosophical and scientific terms, without recourse to religious or theological assumptions.
Are we being inconsistent? It’s the most thorough set of arguments from both sides I’ve ever read. Abortion and the Argument From Potential: This book is worth reading just for this incisive account. Kaczor looks at many pro-life objections to using artificial wombs.
I found this book very helpful in refreshing my pro-life arguments. On that note, I do think Lee has the best and most pithy argument against abortion based on bodily rights. Abortion, Christianity, and Consistency.
Both defend the claim that, because we are essentially persons, we are essentially brains capable of thought. Would such a technology be morally permissible to utilize and would it end the abortion debate? Specifically, he asks us to suppose for the sake of argument that artificial wombs have been perfected and that we can safely as safe as standard surgery, say transfer the unborn at any stage of development from the mother into an artificial womb.
On the persnhood from desires theory, a Buddhist who has achieved his ultimate ends would no longer be considered a person.
Third, Kaczor argues that the right to life must kacozr based upon endowment, not performance. Sign in to use this feature. There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Therefore, it will be false that all humans have the right to life.
Abortion in Applied Ethics categorize this paper. Appealing to reason rather than religious belief, this book is the most comprehensive case against the choice of abortion yet published.
“The Ethics of Abortion: Women’s Rights, Human Life, and the Question o” by Christopher Kaczor
He does not demonize his opponents and tries to present their arguments in the best possible light. Chris Meyers – – Prometheus Books. Kaczor’s book is organized in the following way. I also enjoyed the chapter refuting bodily rights. Kaczor seems to think it would certainly help so perhaps some scientifically minded people out there who are pro-life might want to consider this. Bertha Alvarez Manninen – – Hypatia 28 3: On the chrristopher hand, this claim has been subjected to two major criticisms, both set out clearly by Peter Singer over thirty years ago in Practical Ethicsand both discussed by Kaczor.
The Ethics of Abortion: Women’s Rights, Human Life, and the Question of Justice
Kaczor’s book is systematically outlined to go through all the arguments that he can. Kaczor’s discussion constitutes yet another serious challenge to all those philosophers who wish to defend abortion choice by appealing to the claim that fetuses are not yet persons. Kaczor’s analysis of brain essentialism is a forceful critique of the Tooley-McMahan view. Add both to Cart Add both to List. Alward – – Journal of Medical Ethics 28 2: This brain essentialism implies that we did not come into existence until the last part of pregnancy.
He wants to make sure we know we are making a statement about an action and not about the people who do an action. An Unexpected Journal – Advent Issue: Of course, it is not at all surprising that a book on abortion written by an author in the Crhistopher tradition should have this organization, but it is less than optimal.
Murphy – – Journal of Medical Ethics 11 2: Mutual Scorn Within the Abortion Debate: Kaczor’s book on abortion is a rather surprising one, and that’s a good thing. The Moral Significance of Spontaneous Abortion. The Ethics of Abortion: He deals with the concept of personhood and why the human embryo even should be seen as a fully human person with rights equal to yours and mine.